Sometimes It’s the Truth

June 21, 2011 Injecting Anticipation Into the Oscars

After two years of having 10 Best Picture nominees, the Academy of Motion Picture Arts & Sciences seems to be having pangs of buyer’s remorse (and no doubt pressure from its members and the filmmaking community to re-align itself), as the number of Best Picture nominees will now RANGE between 5 and 10 potential slots.

I guess this is an attempt to add a sense of faux-excitement to the Oscar process, but the biggest issue with the Best Picture race is… the wasted drama of the whole affair.

WHAT’S WASTED DRAMA?

Wasted drama is a phrase I use when talking about screenplays and movies in which a certain amount of the narrative is wasted space because the audience/reader doesn’t care about some element that the screenwriter/filmmaker wants you to care about. I coined the phrase back when Robert Zemeckis’ CONTACT was released; in the trailers, you saw Jodie Foster climbing into the spaceship and making contact… yet in the movie, there’s this whole sequence in the 2nd Act where the spaceship gets destroyed and the characters’ hopes of getting into space are dashed (but we knew from the trailer and just the layout of the film that Jodie Foster was going to go into space in that spaceship)… and then it’s revealed that a “shadow back-up” of the spaceship (which supposedly was prohibitively expensive and required some rare parts and elements to even make) was being concurrently built in Japan(?!?!?!). And so Jodie got to make contact in that ship.

Now that whole sequence, which was maybe 20 to 25 minutes of screen time, was wasted drama; we knew the outcome and weren’t fooled, in fact bored, by the diversion… regardless of how high quality the filmmaking is/was.

I KNOW THE SCORE BEFORE THE GAME IS PLAYED

The same thing has transpired in the last 5 or 6 Best Picture races (and Oscars in general); think about it, we all knew that THE KING’S SPEECH was going to take home the top prize WHEN THE NOMINATIONS were announced (not that it was undeserved, that movie is great and inspiring; exactly what you want from a movie). Even though Fincher’s THE SOCIAL NETWORK was supposedly running neck-n-neck, Hollywood insiders and Vegas bookies knew the score… so it’s wasted drama, the idea of putting 10 films in the pool, or even 5 these days! I think maybe the year BROKEBACK MOUNTAIN lost to CRASH was the only year in the last decade that it was NOT writ large what film was going to grab the gold statue days, if not weeks, before the ceremony.

Take a quick look:
2010: Hurt Locker beat Avatar (the only two films that were in truly in contention)
2009: Slumdog Millionaire (it had to win, too unique and transcendent of a film not to).
2008: No Country For Old Men (it was the creative Coen Brothers’ time)
2007: The Departed (it was Martin Scorsese’s moment)
2006: Crash (upset!!!)
2005: Million Dollar Baby (Clint doesn’t loose)
2004: Lord of the Rings: Return of the King (too much weight of the whole Tolkein event)
2003: Chicago* – last time it was anybody’s guess who was going to win, and I think everyone thought Gangs of New York or The Pianist was going to win that year (probably split the vote).

The major anticipation with this years list of films is going to be the actual number of nominees… it surely won’t be ten again, perhaps only 6 or 7… and then we’ll know the front-runner/shoe-in is a week later, if we don’t know already.

It’s kind of like the NBA Playoffs when they expanded the first round from a 5-Game Series to a 7-Game Series, all but guaranteeing that the No. 8 Seed will lose. Sure, it didn’t happen this year with the Memphis Grizzlies (but they’re not really an 8 seed, if you look at their personnel and record), yet it’s such a rarity… and that kind of rarity does happen (witness Crash…), but the whole reason for watching is to see who won. Why watch if you know who won ahead of time… it’s like DVRing a game, knowing the outcome, yet watching it without skipping the commercials anyway!

When it comes what’s going to happen with the Oscars – 10 films, 5 films, 7 or 8 films – there needs to be less shoe-in films. Now the answer to that could be that less impact films are being made (too risky). However, all the films are usually very good (and let’s not talk about the snubs that happen every year), and at least deserving of the nomination, if not winning… yet of late there’s seems to be little guesswork. And that’s all that I’m saying, I spend three hours of my Sunday watching the Oscar broadcast and would it kill for there to be some sense of surprise?

MASS MEDIA MARKETING HANDCUFFS
Although perhaps the real reason why it’s snap to choose the best picture winner the day the nominations are announced (and that’s the real the anxiety-filled moments) is that movie-making is a victim of the marketing departments controlling the fate what’s going to be in the theaters or not.

The skyrocketing and punishing marketing costs that a film must incur usually outstrips nearly every other element in the process – more expensive than all A-List Stars on film, the CGI budget or all the producers. And oddly, the marketing expense isn’t included as a line item in the budget (yet it is on the profit and loss statement) – when it needs to be, so the true profitability of a film can be assessed or even estimated. The marketing is everything, take a look at Warner Brothers’ Green Lantern with its estimated $100m in domestic (!) marketing! [$35m is typical, $70m on a big summer tentpole], and because marketing IS everything, it’s 150% of everything when it comes to Oscar campaigns and races.

Obviously the Academy can’t go back to 5 films (hence the range of 5 to 10), but the process in itself is flawed due to the narrow focus of the state of cinema in the US in the first place.

June 13, 2011 Hitting RESET, listen to boot up chime and smile

 

Graphic novels are currently all the rage in Hollywood as source material for movies (witness this summer – Thor, Priest, Captain America, X-men: First Class, Green Lantern), and yet the actual comic market is dwindling and appealing to fanboy (men in their early to late 30s and up!) and DC and Marvel (the two biggest names on the block for the past 70 years) are making a strong push for digital download comics to tablet like devices (iPad, Xoom, you know the drill).

In September, DC Comics relaunches all of its major titles with new “no. 1” issues, and basically starts the mythology and continuity over with its entire universe. This is a gamble (one that I’ll at least put money down on) to lure new readers to the fold (old readers will read, gripe perhaps, but still read, because they lover the medium and the characters are like best friends they’ve never met). It’s interesting, because 25 years ago DC did something similar with the now-famous Crisis On Infinite Earth maxi-series (which ushered in the plethora of mostly terribly company-wide crossovers); Crisis (as it is known in comic parlance) was designed to streamline the exponentially vast and unwieldy DC multiverse that grow over the prior 50 years (Crisis coincided with the 50th anniversary of DC as a publishing entity).

WHAT CRISIS DID (or HOPED TO DO)

At the time DC had “infinite Earths” where there were different histories of the DC Universe, and it was just too unwieldy. For instance, Earth-1 was the current and primary Earth of the modern continuity. However, the older versions of Superman, Batman, Flash, Green Arrow, and the Justice Society of America (incarnations of the characters who first appeared in the 1930s and 1940s) couldn’t be “replaced” and banished to the archives… so they existed on Earth-2, and there were too many “Earths” to keep track of, and to enable new readers to actually thoroughly enjoy reading DC Comics. So to clean out the redundancies and unwieldiness, DC Editor-in-Chief Jeannette Khan authorized Marv Wolfman and George Perez to burn down the house and build it up new again (with some safeguards).

THE BIG CAPE WAS THE MAIN PROBLEM

The biggest revision was with Superman; maligned-at-the-time writer/artist John Byrne stripped down Superman of most his historic continuity and hit “reset” with his MAN OF STEEL miniseries. Was it a success? Perhaps because arch villain Lex Luthor was also reimagined as a corrupt politician looking to gain control of the world through financial dominance (this was the mid 80s, so that was part of the zeitgeist… funny how things don’t change), and that changed the dynamic of Superman and his continuity. Other big changes were the death of Barry Allen the Silver Age Flash (the man in the red suit, not to be confused with Jay Garret the Golden Age Flash with the silver, Hermes-esque helmet). I argued in a few letters to the editor that Barry Allen was killed because he represented a means to travel back and forth between the infinite earths by achieving a certain vibrational pattern (I’m soooo showing my inner comic fanboy/geek, but so what? I loved reading comics from like 20 years).

Crisis caused an endless series of debates among comic fans, and I wonder how many were actually driven from the market; but overall I think DC was better off, because there wasn’t a need to service 50 years of continuity that no doubt hamstrung writers and artists.

MARVEL’S ULTIMATE PLAN

A decade ago Marvel did something similar with its “Ultimate” line of books – centered around Spider-man; it was ostensibly done to make Spider-man more accessible to kids (all the FF characters in the Ultimate Universe were in their late teens or early 20s) and new readers because the Tobey Maguire Spiderman movie propelled comics into the front and center of pop culture. But other stalwarts of the Marvel Universe followed suit, like The Ultimates, The X-men, Hulk, and Fantastic Four.

DC ROLLS THE DICE WITH THE TAILOR

DC is going ahead with costume redesigns (courtesy of Geoff Johns and fan-favorite Jim Lee) and perhaps new (variations on) origins of the major and minor heroes… this isn’t new, again, because back when the Silver Age Heroes appeared there were costume revamps and some origin changes, too. Even Superman and Batman had changes, they might not be readily apparent to the casual observer, but fans (not just diehard ones) know the different; other characters like Hawkman, The Atom, Green Lantern and Green Arrow considerably changed. And some events like Superman’s entire time as Superboy was erased from the DC universe (damning all those really exciting Jim Shooter Legion of Super-Hero stories). But the thing to remember about that “reset” was, there was maybe only 15 or so years of historical continuity to abolish, since then the Silver Age has run for close to 50 years (because most of the major events of Crisis were gradually eroded away… even Barry Allen returned after close to a 20 year absence; that was kind of the last straw of credibility for me.

WHAT WE COULD EXPECT

So whatever happens with DC’s 21st “Reset” of its dense, popular and beloved comic book heroes and universe, it’ll perhaps make comics more accessible. I stopped reading comics after close to two decades about four or five years ago… the weight of the continuity drained the excitement and unpredictable nature of the stories out of the medium. You know certain characters are just never going to die, and if someone happens to, then a semi-creative writer will come up with some eyebrow raising conceit to bring back a character. The old rule of, “if you don’t see a body, then they’re not dead” became a drama-killing joke in comicdom.

WHY RESETS ARE GOOD

Resets are necessary to keep a franchise fresh and accessible. J.J. Abrams reset STAR TREK, all for the better if you ask me. Everyone loves the Kirk-Spock-Bones dynamic, and since those actors can’t play those roles – in the prime of their storytelling lives – the reboot with new actors and changes in the history and continuity (e.g. the destruction of Vulcan) could signal that everything is fair game (even a new Star Trek TV series with Kirk, Spock, Bones, Scotty and Uhura). The big question mark with DC’s reset is will they stick with it? Will the creative teams yearn of the old days, old ways and old conventions, patterns and grooves? To be bold, you would hope that the editorial staff for the next decade at least is vigilant in vetoing the return of the old in the inner workings. The original Batgirl is returning with the paralysis inflicted upon her by The Joker in the seemingly at the time one-shot (and still masterful) “The Killing Joke.” I applaud this; don’t even make her Barbara Gordon; or if you do, don’t give her the personality of the previous one. Be bold like that. I’m most curious to see the costumes and see how events of the second decade of the 21st century affect the origins and motivations of the characters.

WHAT IF… IT FAILED

Marvel used to have this really cool series called “What If…” in which certain primal events in the Marvel Universe history turned out differently (hence the genius title); but the re-imagined events only lasted for one issue, and they usually resulted in the retiring of the heroes or the events occurred in some other fashion. But this DC thing could be revolutionary for a very insular pop culture institution that has governed a great deal of pop culture beyond the pages of news pulp 4-color disposable diversions (consider that everything is on high-quality paper to accommodate the computer coloring that now goes on).

PIQUED INTEREST IN OLD FAVORITES

I might be tempted to start reading my favorites again; and they were many – Aquaman, Green Arrow, Teen Titans, Robin (which reminds me, will Dick Grayson be Robin again? Or will Nightwing be a character at the beginning or yet to come? And will the Teen Titans be the original or the “new”?), Flash, Justice League, Spectre, Detective Comics, Black Canary, the Legion of Super Heroes (which has been completely rebooted at least 3 times since 1990) and maybe a few others; not sure what those original 52 will consist of… the Black Batman, based in Africa, is going to be interesting, just like how Marvel’s Black Panther was interesting, when they finally gave him some teeth in the 90s, after 30 years of being as impenetrable as the GOP think Barack Obama is, and completely uninteresting (yet, with enormous potential).

More to come…

May 11, 2011 Arcane Acquisition Formats…

I was trawling through my old Hotmail account, and I can came across this reminder that my American Cinematographer subscription had expired (it expired a few years ago, and I haven’t gotten it and my Sight & Sound subscript renewed…sadly). I remember when those two magazines would come in the mail, I’d be so excited to see what new films were making waves in Europe (from Sight & Sound) and how certain images were achieved in U.S. films (AmCig)…

There was something unexpected and more than interesting to be learned/discovered in both magazines … more pure examinations of cinema (not the kind of PR fishwrap that most other entertainment-oriented are) that typically spurred me to find out about all sorts of other films, filmmakers and impetus to create movies. It was a near obsession of mine to find the best places to purchase Region 2 DVDs to see these obscure French or Italian or Russian films that never found a release in  North America (home video or theatrical). I suspended those subscriptions for money reasons probably back in ’06 when my life started to go into the abyss, and on a certain level I wonder if my waning interest in cinema in general is because I’m missing the invigorating energy those monthly updates provided for me. You can’t exist in a vacuum, and you need inspiration from other artists… that’s what the Impressionists did, same with the Expressionists and probably nearly every other art movement (which wasn’t considered a “movement” at the time, just what people were doing that was pushing the boundaries).

So AmCig has attempted to lured me back with this article on INCEPTION (which I had always wanted to read, but never got around to); here it is reprinted for your reading pleasure…
http://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/ac/ac0710/index.php?startid=26#/30 — what I didn’t know about this film was that certain amounts of the film were shot in 65mm/70mm (which I know director Chris Nolan used to some extent, in the form of IMAX, on THE DARK KNIGHT)… Nolan and DoP Wally Pfister’s quest for the most high resolution image on film has them exploring different ways to combine film formats (in this case 35mm anamorphic with 65mm) to get the startlingly clear images that they achieved on INCEPTION. Pfister hits the nail on the head when says that “[sic] film has such amazing latitude, where he can underexpose 3-stops and over-expose 5-stops in the same frame with frame… something digital cinema is striving to achieve, but just can’t… yet.”

I almost took it for granted that Nolan and Pfister would have used maybe the RED on INCEPTION or some other digital format (like the Sony camera George Lucas used on Star Wars or the Viper that David Fincher and Michael Mann are fond of using), because of the extensive visual effects work… but I was wrong, so very wrong…

I’ve always been a fan of the different 35mm film formats (anamorphic being the least impressive, things like VistaVision and SuperTechnirama have been so alluring) that cropped up during the 1950s and understand that they’ve basically fallen to the wayside because they are a little more difficult to use, the cost and the learning curve to make sure that image is still acceptable, but certain filmmakers still dig them out (i.e. on CASINO ROYALE they used Super Technirama which is a 2-perf 2.35 format that Sergio Leone primarily used on his spaghetti Westerns, the image is more grainy than usual — think back to the b&w bathroom fight in CASINO ROYALE — and I think it uses flat lenses to get that widescreen look, but it’s cheap because it’s 2-perf you only use 1/2 as much film as you do with normal 35mm cameras), and I want to be one of those daring filmmakers. But I haven’t thought about directing a film in close to five years (although something is gelling inside right now, something that would be impressive… if I can pull it off, and it would just be a 5 minute short), so my visions and desires have been stifled.

I guess what’s most attractive to me about the fact that Nolan & Pfister used 70mm on INCEPTION, is that I just saw a 70mm print of CLEOPATRA with Liz Taylor (which I discussed in an earlier post), and was wowed by the clarity and super-sharpness of that film (which IS the most impressive spectacle of all-time, you’ll never seen anything like that film… no one had before, and it will never happen post facto). I couldn’t get over how beautiful the celluloid image looked — as good as it could have looked in HD? Perhaps, and now that I’m reading about INCEPTION, I’m mad that I can’t see it again in the theater to take a closer look at what was shot in 70mm and what wasn’t.

I remember back in 1995, when Se7en came out there was all this talk about how Fincher convinced New Line to distribute a few prints with this seldom-used silver-retention process which gave the blacks an almost lush metallic quality, and I was lucky enough to see one of those silver-retention prints at the Fox Theater in Westwood… and it was beyond memorable (as I can still see that film in my mind’s eye), adding an extra creepiness to that skin-crawling masterclass in thrillers. There are a few other processing techniques (ENR to name one) that are interesting, too, but they have also fallen out of favor since digital color-timing has become the norm and these chemical processes are deemed “less” predictable, less “controllable”, i.e., the Suits can’t come in and dabble against the wishes of the director and ciematographer.

Just because digital is so prevalent these days, doesn’t mean that film should ever go away. I mean recently-passed war photographer Tim Hetherington used a Hasselbald in the field!!! And his work is more than impressive, and more than human, I think, because the images were captured with a “difficult” format.

Okay, perhaps more next week…

May 9, 2011 The Past isn’t even the Past, it’s the present and future

It’s been a while since I last posted to this blog… but not because I’ve been hiding or have had nothing to say. More like I’ve been super-busy, and I haven’t had a chance to cobble together enough of consistent thought to put up here.

Been working on a spec SONS OF ANARCHY as means to get my foot in the door on the TV front. As TV is a more elusive challenge that writing feature films, in terms of getting properly noticed and considered for work. The timing for working in TV is a tight window during the year, whereas for films it’s basically year-round, and TV requires a different type of extensive relationships to considered to work on a writing staff (or be able to pitch shows for development). Writing features means, coming up with an amazing concept, then executing it a pinnacle quality, then getting it in the hands of a lot of people, and something CAN happen. That’s happened to my brother and I numerous times in the past, it’s a way to get an agent, to get noticed by development executives, get the radar of producers and to be on “the list” at various studios.

TV has a similar process in terms of getting the networks to endorse your work, but you can only really get a job if you know the showrunner or other top tier producers who can vouch for you.

It’s been a tad difficult to decide what screenplay we’re going to write next. It’s always such a chore to consider high-octane commercial considerations on top of developing all the compelling elements that are required to create a potent piece of wordsmithing. And there’s the whole branding thing to consider… maybe sci-fi is next to go with the two TV pilots we have burning on the stove.

One of the big “Hollywood” moments of late was the death of sublime beauty Elizabeth Taylor, and to commemorate her passing The American Cinematheque is having a Elizabeth Taylor festival this week, I just saw a 70mm print of CLEOPATRA…

I’ve never seen this oft-talked about film before, and at 4 hours, it’s tough to fit in. But I decided to make the effort, and it’s worth the investment of your time… if only to see a type of filmmaking that was never achieved before nor approached since (James Cameron’s TITANIC and AVATAR pale in comparison), and it 70mm the image is shockingly clean, deep, robust and vibrant. Sure, everyone loves the RED camera (and other HD variations) these days, and film is extremely costly just to develop, and a 70mm production is definitely financial suicide these days, however, CLEOPATRA was the spectacle of all spectacles. I honestly can say I haven’t seen a production as lavish as this. Taylor was in a new and differet bustline magnifying costume in EVERY scene (except for the two scenes in which she was basically naked). The thing about this film that will have you marveling about it is the depth and scope of the production design, the sheer weight and extravagance of what was constructed to bring to life that ancient world. No set, no costume, no make-up, no hair style, no armor was skimped on. The scene in which Cleopatra arrives in Rome to greet Caesar in jaw-dropping, because you know that every element in the massive, OG HD frame was handcrafted by some of the cinema’s best craftsman. The hulking black sphinx was probably five stories tall, dragged by around 50 to 80 men with Liz Taylor perched at the top in this metallic gold gown and domineering headdress/crown of the Lower Nile.

I could go on gushing about the film… but you’ll probably, sadly, never be able to experience the film as I saw it; even if you saw a Blu-ray DVD of the film… the size and clarity of the image enhanced the power of the story (which at times was maudlin, but never boring or slow… even now I’m thinking about the Battle of Atchion, where Marc Antony’s galleon chased after Octavian’s warship, and scratching my head at how that was pulled off with 70mm cameras).

You can see what other films are playing this week and next at the Cinematheque’s website; I’ll be seeing WHO’S AFRAID OF VIRGINIA WOOLF? this coming Wednesday night. If you haven’t seen too many classic films (or none at all) on the big screen, you should. These films were meticulously crafted for this presentation only — TV and home video wasn’t even thought of or considered during these productions and the depth of detail in the images underscore this fact considerably.

Any way, seeing CLEOPATRA made me think about Chris Nolan’s THE DARK KNIGHT and how he used 70mm IMAX cameras to film some of the most action packed scenes in that dynamic, modern day spectacle (although it hardly compares). I believe Nolan is close to finalizing casting for his third trip to Gotham City (as he produces Zak Snyder’s foray to Metropolis with the new Superman film… not that interested, and only because Superman is essentially a one-note character… hopefully, they can achieve the greatness that Richard Donner did). These epic films of today, aren’t nearly so epic in relation to 1950s Hollywood epics… and the magic lantern doesn’t have the same awe-inducing and awe-inspiring quality, because of the heavy reliance on computer generated imagery to create the horizon.Any way it made me think about Chris Nolan’s THE DARK KNIGHT and how he used 70mm IMAX cameras to film some of the most action packed scenes in that dynamic, modern day spectacle (although it hardly compares). I believe Nolan is close to finalizing casting for his third trip to Gotham City (as he produces Zak Snyder’s foray to Metropolis with the new Superman film… not that interested, and only because Superman is essentially a one-note character… hopefully, they can achieve the greatness that Richard Donner did). These epic films of today, aren’t nearly so epic in relation to 1950s Hollywood epics… and the magic lantern doesn’t have the same awe-inducing and awe-inspiring quality, because of the heavy reliance on computer generated imagery to create the horizon. The artifice of today’s epics the complete wink-wink nature of CG VFX images robs the movies of a sense of wonder… I can’t even remember the last time the physical production of a movie blew me away… it’s not part of the currency of entertainment anymore… you just can’t be impressed, but you can be dismissive when it’s done poorly or shoddily. Funny, that way…

I’m wondering what Steve Spielberg’s WAR HORSE (a WWI story) is going to be like… he tends to hold the torch for that impressive filmmaking magic of yesteryear unlike the vast majority of filmmakers today, even his contemporaries (if they get to make movies anymore, since most don’t and haven’t in the last 10 years).

The past can’t control the present or the future, but it should have some ability to inform the present and future… if only to ensure that what we see as film and TV is at least engaging and entertaining.

March 18, 2011 TV is dead, long live TV

So if you haven’t heard by now Netflix, the internet DVD rental and movie streaming company, has acquired the distribution rights for the David Fincher-Kevin Spacey episodic project called HOUSE OF CARDS (based on a British TV show) and Netflix secured the project with an unprecedented two season 26-episode pre-order… probably to the tune of $100m (considering that the licensing fees are $4-6m per episode of this type of episodic programming).

This effectively disrupts the nomenclature what we have conventionally called television in terms of scripted programming, but only just the name… the most challenging and satisfying forms of scripted drama will need to be called episodic filmed entertainment… yet everyone will still called “a TV show” or “that show”, but considering how the Broadcast networks are still hamstrung by having to genuflect to the lowest common denominator, held hostage content-wise by the FCC and catering to the Central Time Zone it’s no surprise something like this occurred. A few years ago, I read an interview with the CEO of Netflix, and he was stressing that Netflix’s original business model was to use the internet to watch flicks, not distribute DVDs. So Netflix is finally exceeding its original plans by becoming a generator of original content… and when it comes from Fincher and Spacey, we have to expect the most challenging and dynamic content… stuff that would get hamstrung on even basic cable (i.e. AMC and F/X, which are two networks that I love for their programming choices).

Netflix has a supremely loyal customer base and they know to how to deliver what the customer wants and a price the customer is happy with; just go ask Blockbuster if you don’t believe me.

Netflix’s move alters the episodic filmed entertainment landscape… as it is mimicking the model pioneered by HBO, but perhaps with more interesting results. To stream movies on Netflix, you pay a monthly subscription fee (of around $16.95, which comparable to HBO) and you get a certain number of programs (TV shows and movies) that you can view through the streaming options, plus you can have Netflix mail you a certain number of DVDs (this is “unlimited” but due to mailing delays and viewing time, you probably can’t see more than 15 movies a month; and I’m sure there is some wiki somewhere that can instruct you on how to maximize your DVD rental volume per month). This is the ultimate a la carte entertainment programming… I don’t know too many people who watch more than 15 movies a month on HBO… considering the release date windows of home video and premium cable channels is maybe 9 months from the actual release of a film in the theater or release on DVD of a TV show. That’s the clincher that makes Netflix’s business decision most interesting, because most people visit Netflix to get their home video fix… and while they’re deciding what new movie to watch that they missed in the theatre, but might have a two week backlog before the DVD can be shipped, they can stream HOUSE OF CARDS (and all the DVD sell-thru revenue will go directly to Netflix’s coffers… a revenue stream that didn’t have previously, and in which TV shows on DVD I believe still have a marquee value that films no longer have).

Content creation and consumption time is changing… hopefully for the better in terms of quality of programming.

February 21, 2011 To Move With A Purpose

So what does writing original screenplays and original TV pilots actually get you? Not much, unless you’re a high profile writer… so what does that mean for those striving to craft a career in the writing game?

It’s never easy, because writers slave over their notes, keyboards and script print outs for months trying to get the right balance between explosive words and the page and a compelling, straight-forward story that makes sense to those who might not have the same patience, focus and imagination required to take a leap of mental faith with material and actually SEE what is trying to be communicated.

One of the things that Hollywood Execs seem to lose sight of (more often than not) is that a challenging story is THE best kind of story to be told around the magic lantern campfire — known as the cinema screen (or HD LCD these days). Everything starts with the story… yet it and the writer are typically second-thoughts, because the marketing people think (I presume) unexecuted concept is more of a viable indicator of a $100+ million project’s success in the commercial marketplace — especially from an idea that has already proven itself — than a well-crafted story with compelling and emotionally driven characters.

I mentioned in my last post that I was moving forward with several graphic novel projects, and I was toying with posting some of the penciled art pages as they came in… well, below is the opening page for DUSTED, a an IP we developed about 4 years ago and most recently wrote an original two-part TV pilot for.

DUSTED, the TV show, was created with a 5-season plan and a detailed bible for the first season (12 episodes) and thorough explanation of the characters and where they will be at the end of each season. We envisioned a sprawling sci-fi world that does what only sci-fi can do (true sci-fi, not the soft stuff on the SyFy Channel… why is every series on that channel, just a normal soap opera drama with a few doses of techno-magic thrown in?) and that is make commentary about the human condition of the current times by projecting out into the future an extreme state… Star Trek was great at doing this, so was SciFi Channel’s BattleStar Galactica (when they dumped that show, they rebranded themselves to appeal to women more… a notoriously anti-science fiction demographic, so other cable networks are prime locations to do more active and imaginative science fiction… Starz, HBO, Cinemax, TNT and AMC can do what SyFy opts NOT to do, and therefore beat them at their own game)… DUSTED the graphic novel will (hopefully) tell a tale that meshes with architecturally tight joints to the TV pilot.

As DUSTED is a versatile IP, the graphic novel approach should give us a certain amount of leverage to pushing the project into other media… other than the printed page.

The other two projects are moving ahead nicely too, especially EXTINCTION AGENDA — which is going to blow people’s socks off when you see the final art… this colorist who just agreed to work on the project is jaw-dropping with her unique talents. You, dear readers, will have to wait to see her stuff… I was considering posting samples of her online gallery art, but it’s better if it’s all a surprise… maybe by the beginning of the summer it will all be ready… yeah, 3 to 4 months out is a long time, but it’s ’cause we need to wait for the colorist’s schedule to open up — and I need to lock down the contracts with the penciler.

Have you seen Carl Rinsch’s “The Gift”? This little short, produced for Philips TV, has inspired me to take a new tact in moving my career forward… and that project — a funneling of an existing script’s concept and its inciting incident into a 4 minute teaser short is the next project that I’m developing. Hopefully, I can raise the money and pull the divergent strings together by  the mid summer, as my idea will raise eyebrows and re-raise our now-flaccid flag.

Other interesting news for me? I was elected the co-chairman of the Committee of Black Writers at the Writers Guild of America… my other co-chair David Wyatt and I are going to be doing great things (hopefully) with the committee; mainly redefining the purpose of the committee and broadening its reach and appeal. The first event planned under the new leadership is the inaugural panel of “Writing in Color”, a panel series that will discuss telling uniquely African-American stories in the broader context of a mainstream TV series. Wendy Calhoun, staff writer on F/X’s JUSTIFIED, will be featured along with actress Erica Tazel and (fingers crossed) showrunner Graham Yost.

Also, don’t forget to read CLEAN — the Serialized Novel

February 4, 2011 Take the Wind Out of My Sails, Why Don’t You!

After the Golden Globes and the SAG Awards, I’m not entirely sure there can or will be any surprises at the upcoming Academy Awards in three shorts weeks!

THE SOCIAL NETWORK, such a fantastic movie and easily director David Fincher’s best or second best film (it’s hard to top Se7en), seems to be now the underdog to THE KING’S SPEECH. My big quibble about Colin Firth’s star vehicle is, I’m tired of their British period dramas constantly sucking up award nominations – it’s like the Academy feels some sort of reverences for these films; and yes, most of them usually are good, but they typically show us an England that is gone, they show us an England that is still very much in love with its former glory. And didn’t we fight revolutionary war to not have to wear the yoke of their cultural oppression?

What’s conversely interesting is, we don’t see too many British films set in the modern era that deal with the modern, diverse citizenry of London or the UK in general. British period dramas are starched and devoid of people of color or truly compelling storylines outside of the royal family, the aristocracy and the upperclass. Can you name one that wasn’t some lower class-examination, crime film? Outside of the brilliant DIRTY PRETTY THINGS, there are very, very, verry a UK-born film that showed us the true, diverse, multicultural England of today… sure, there are probably several dozen that don’t show up on these shores, but still… why don’t we get to see them? Or are they even made. I know that late, great filmmaker Anthony Minghella’s (THE ENGLISH PATIENT, TALENTED MR. RIPLEY, COLD MOUNTAIN’S) final film dealt with the current UK society, but that film I think got a simultaneous Blockbuster-exclusive DVD/limited theatrical release… and was arguably one of his lesser efforts (but still quite good).

While I can’t even name half of the other 8 films that are in the Best Picture Category, it’s almost a pitiless barometer that the race to the finish line won’t be a photo finish but something yawned about. Oh, wait, TOY STORY 3 is up for both Picture and Animated Feature… as stupendous that the Pixar film is, it’s a shoe in for Animated Feature Oscar and does it rarely need to be in the Picture category as well?

As for the acting awards, those all seem predetermined, too, Natalie Portman after years showing promise and just missing the mark (her last really compelling and truthful performance was in CLOSER nearly half a decade ago), is the odds on favorite to take home the golden statute… if she doesn’t that would be more surprising than when Eddie Murphy lost to Alan Arkin for LITTLE MISS SUNSHINE.

One of the things I relished about the Academy Awards show back in the 80s and 90s was the sheer drama of the event. Sure, it was probably still a little rigged, but prior to Harvey Weinstein and Miramax’s marketing stunts and tricks to sway Academy Voters (also marketing and branding became much more intense as the 90s wore on, so not all the blame can be lain at Harvey’s feet) one almost felt like there was real anxiety and anticipation about the reading of the name in the envelop. If you don’t believe me, then take a look back at some of the acceptance speeches from the 70s, 80s and early 90s (many are online… YouTube, I presume, because seemingly everything is available for your review there… except for celebrity sex tapes).

I wonder if my malaise with the film component of the entertainment industry is more widespread that I want to believe, and that movies do still matter to people (whereas, there seems to be more “appointment TV” than “must-see” movies in the multiplex). We’ll see what the Nielson ratings are for the upcoming Oscars broadcast.

In my last post I mentioned that I was writing a serialized novel, and that you could read CLEAN at this URL. Well, I was a little slow in getting the first chapter revised, but it’s up now for your review (it might get revised a little bit more though). The plan is that I’ll add a new chapter every 10 to 14 days, until the first part of the multi-part story is complete (which coincides with the end of the first story arc of the TV series… if it ever becomes a TV series).

What else is new? Oh, yeah, the comic artist’s sample pages came through this week. Very good work for samples. I have a few quibbles with composition and some of the images (note to self: use reference photos more often for complicated imagery that you have in mind). I’m excited otherwise, and now we need to strike up the contracts and engage the artist (still waiting to see the work from the other two artists). I have to find a colorist, too; there was some outrageously impressive Italian woman’s work that I saw the other day, so she’s the first person I contact.

Only drawback… what else? The finances to actually do the books! Or at least the proposals. So that’s what the next few weeks are about.

More next time, and I’ll return with the Tinseltown Tips next posting.

Best on your endeavors

January 16, 2011 New Year, New Horizons… Well, Maybe

I’m not a big fan of the November/December holidays… for a variety of reasons, but mainly there is a huge amount of unnecessary stress created by the gathering of family and friends. Family drama is always uncomfortable, and more often than not it spikes during the December holidays.

One of the good things about the November/December holidays is the intense films that get released… almost as if the high stakes drama of a movie trumps whatever you might be going through… if even just for two hours. BLACK SWAN was this year’s winner for intense film (although I still need to see BLUE VALENTINE), and I’m not really a fan of Aronofsky‘s work (not that he’s bad, far from it — he’s exceptional, just that I haven’t connected with his previous films… ever notice how when you tell some that you didn’t like a film or TV show, they instinctively decide that you didn’t like it for a reason that has nothing to do with the quality of the films? Aronofsky, as I see it, punishes his characters and therefore it’s hard for me to want to spend anymore than 5 minutes with them). So I wish beautiful and committed Natalie Portman all the luck with the Golden Globes tonight for her performance in Aronofsky’s minefield; incidentally, I can’t wait to see her in Tom Twyker’s CLOUD ATLAS… an impressively inventive novel that will challenge us as film viewers.

Also, I’m usually burned out creatively around Thanksgiving, although I still have plans and ideas emerging, actually executing those plans, ideas or inspirations seems like the hardest thing to do.

So as the new year begins, and I feel recharged I have to make sure that I focus my creative efforts on projects that CAN move forward. Ones that aren’t just “good”, but will be actionable.

I’m not sure if there’s much of point in writing original screenplays these days, because after recent meeting with an Oscar-winning actor’s production company it’s more and more pronounced that you almost required to have a pre-existing property. Better than solid writing doesn’t cut these days (just look at what’s in the multiplexes these days), so you gotta me aggressively creatively and imaginative with what you do.

To that end, two or three graphic novels properties are in the creative engine right now, and hopefully their promo materials will be ready by ComicCon in July. But you can see some of the material on our website (as each stage gets completed — script first, then character design sketches, page layout thumbnails, etc.); our site is www.shadowboxercinema.net. One is called THE EXTINCTION AGENDA, the other is called TAROT. Be sure to read up on the developments… we’re looking for an artist right now.

And we’re working on three (at least three) visual projects; one is a Environmental PSA, one is a photography project and one is a music video concept. More on those as they happen.

Also, I’ll be writing a novel… as serialized novel (I was reading up on Arthur Conan Doyle and said to myself, why not?) to be published on the web; it will be based on an unproduced TV pilot (and subsequent episodes that I’ve written and/or outlined for the first season of this cable-targeted show… it’s excruciatingly hard to agents to read and respond to the script, whereas the showrunners who have read were quite impressed, so I know/feel it has merit as a story and that the writing is solid); the show is called CLEAN.

You can read CLEAN here at www.whoisjonasmagnum.wordpress.com; it’s named after the main character Jonas Magnum… you’ll find out more about personal change, and the lengths that one must go through to achieve that kind of revolutionary change. It’s a dark thriller, in case you couldn’t guess from the title or premise… you’ll have to read it to learn more about it, and I welcome any and everyone’s feedback.

So I’m going to watch the Golden Globes, or just part of it, later tonight. And I might drop my thoughts on it this evening or tomorrow… hard to tell.

Until next time.

November 29, 2010 Wrap Up…

It’s been an odd last two years for me, because I haven’t had representation since I left The Gersh Agency… and going there was a mistake all around, but I thought we were on our way to grabbing the brass ring by sign with them… Alas that wasn’t the case.

So I’ve refocused my efforts as a writer and a director over the last two years, and wanted to aim for the TV brass ring and skip features (for the moment), because the feature film market yearns for serving to the lowest common denominator more than ever before, as if movies have to “broadcast” (i.e. hit all Four Quadrants) when it’s a known fact that “broadcasting” is a dying entertainment business model/strategy. Just look at how successful USA and TNT have been by narrow-casting.

The current resurgence of TV with its narrow-casting model (perfected by cable channels like AMC and F/X) is most appealing (sure, visually creatively TV doesn’t pack the same punch as a film… mainly for budget reasons and the grinding schedule) and the talent is just as compelling and on a certain level more compelling, because you watch shows on the cable channels and they can be relatively fresh faces.

I’ve said it before, but it bares repeating again here the best, consistent filmed entertainment for the past 5 years has been on TV. The excitement that I once reserved for films has drastically waned (and I don’t see how it’s going to comeback, because the “auteur” school of filmmaking has been shutdown by the exponential marketing costs that control which and how films get made) as the once-exceptional nature of cinema (foreign and domestic) in the US has declined. I don’t get hyped up for the US independent scene at all, and the usually groundbreaking foreign films just don’t show up on our shores that much (marketing too expensive)…

And all this re-focus based on passion for the medium has led to us feverishly putting together a TV pilot to pitch to a long time friend who is comedy head at a major channel.

Preparing for a Pitch is always a stressful time, because you must guess what questions the executive(s) might ask, then develop answers for hypothetical questions. And then you have to work on delivering the pitch as efficiently and effectively as possible. When I was at Michigan in the business school we had to do quite a number of presentations and that training has served me well. Pitching requires a lot of skills – performance skills, storytelling skills, excellent interpersonal skills, timing skills and quick-wittedness… also the ability to know how to “Close.” What is knowing how to Close? Knowing when to press for an actionable response, knowing when you’ve done all the selling that you can, and anything else you say is harming the effort.

This week was also a fun and informative month, as I was part of the UMEC group that dined with veteran TV director Mark Cendrowksi, the series director for the popular “Big Bang Theory” on CBS. Mark was a great, he spoke candidly and informatively. As a multi-camera director, Mark is probably working at the top of his game right, as Big Bang is an exceedingly popular and well produced show, with a great cast that has remarkable chemistry.

Here are some interesting things that Mark shared: that Big Bang was a failed pilot in a previous season — the girl was different, she was drug addict (or something dangerous like that) and the show didn’t test well, but the Network and others were captivated by the geek scientist characters (the original chick was like a hooker or something), and so Chuck Lore and UofM alum Bill Prady were able to retool the pilot, re-shoot it (in it’s current configuration) and the show was one of the few bright spots that TV season… which I think was just right around the WGA Strike.

Mark also talked about some of the obscenely  paid and unreal jobs that are “under the radar” in TV; he mentioned that a few seasons back there were two “jokers” punch-up guys, who were not staff writers on a show, but they would come on to several shows during the Network Run-Thru (when the network executives see the episode before it goes to tape in front of a live studio audience), watch the show, then sit down with the writers and pitch additive jokes… for maybe $25,000 for a night’s work! Yeah, you heard that right, $25K for one night’s work… where do I apply?

And now back with the regular feature, that’s been interrupted of late…

TINSELTOWN TIPS #6 – No Man Is An Island…

Hollywood is a difficult place to make things happen, and unless you’re coming of a successful project sale, are tops at the box office or  dominated your timeslot in the ratings or won a huge award… all things that new and young people don’t have going for them, then you need to continue to cultivate relationships in such a way that you can bring your projects to those people (producers, directors, showrunners, etc.) who are plugged in.

So don’t attempt to go it alone, join forces with those of much higher stature than you… even if that means sharing credit on work that the other party did little or next to nothing work on. As this an okay trade-off, right? Because you are increasing your chance of making a sale if the “team” is more highly regarded because of the upper echelon element; so if you have to split credit and fees, do so, as it’s your first or second project, and  splitting fees is better than no fees. One thing to remember though is… no deal is better than a bad deal, so know upfront what you’re willing to fight for and what you’ll fall on your sword about. A bad deal will bring a sour taste to your mouth every time is generates money or discussion from the moment you sign the contract until the day they put you in the ground. Whereas no deal, just means no deal… but it doesn’t always mean a dead deal… it could comeback in a different incarnation and/or with different players in the future.

I’m putting this concept to practice in the next few days with a TV project that has the pilot nearly finished, and the first season has been outlined (the broad strokes), which a few details sample episodes. I’ll be approaching a well-respected showrunner about partnering up on the project. Said showrunner responded favorably to our writing, and the show is right in the showrunner’s wheelhouse. Of course, he probably has his own projects, but if he responds to the project and we’re offering him co-creator credit then he really has nothing to lose… unless he thinks were chumps and doesn’t want to work with us for a personal reason or he’s too busy with his own material to be bothered (but if the idea IS good, then people WILL make time… if they aren’t asked to do too much work and get more buck from their efforts). More on that as it happens…

October 17, 2010 Newness, Freshness… Staying Alive in the torrid TV landscape

The last few weeks have been busy, busy, busy… outside of going to the Peter Benedek party (which was fun, btw, and I met some cool people) and getting our pilot script trounced at my writers group, I’ve been trying to watch as many of the new TV show premieres and all the old stuff I had been watching.

The surprise hit — for me — is the Ted Griffin (Ocean’s 11 and Matchstick Men screenwriter) down-on-his-luck private eye show on F/X  –”Terriers.” Donal Logue is the star of this funny, quirky, but captivating and engaging show, which is obviously what “The Rockford Files” revamp should have been (if you didn’t know, NBC was trying to revive that beloved series with Dermot Mulroney in the lead)… but painfully wasn’t. Which is too bad, because I loved that Jim Garner show; however, unlike with the creatively bankrupt choices of remaking movies, remaking TV shows has failed to been a successful venture. Maybe the problem is remaking successful shows; I’m sure there’s lots of great shows that didn’t last, but were beloved for their short fun (or didn’t make it past the pilot phase) that COULD be re-envisioned and then remade. There was a show called “Global Frequency” that was based on a DC/Vertigo comic by Warren Ellis (creator of the new Bruce Willis/Helen Mirren movie RED) that had a cool pilot, not great, but cool premise, that just didn’t work on The CW (which I don’t think at the time a scifi-y investigative unit was going to w0rk); it starred Michelle Forbes, one of my favorite actresses of her archetype and age. But for a show like that to work on The CW, now and then, the female lead – Miranda Zero (if memory serves me correct) — you need some super sexy chick with an edge to her. Someone like Maggie Q, who obviously turned heads and captured eyeballs for “Nikita.”

I’m not sure if TV Execs or the creator-types look to revive projects that failed as pilots or failed to catch on with the audience at a certain time in the landscape, but if there is a business model or creative mandate, then I’m saying, “at least try it” — as we’ve seen shows like Family Guy and Arrested Development get a second-life from viewers’ passion.

Michael Chiklis‘ new show No Ordinary Family is interesting, filling the void that “Heroes” failed to do since the first season. “Heroes” was nearly unwatchable in its last two seasons, and the promise it had after the first half of the first season was — skies the limit! Tim Kring and the others could have created their own superhero mythology, but I guess Stan Lee wasn’t consulted. Chiklis’s show has heart and merit, but it’s focusing on the family dynamics substantially instead of the largest mystery is why I think the show can last. It’s a little hard to see Chiklis as “nice guy” since he played a complete prick in “The Shield“, but he’s such a charismatic actor that he’ll erase the stain of Vic Mackey in no time.

The first casualty of the new season was Fox’s “Lone Star“… I happened to catch the pilot (on DVR) and it IS a show with potential, but we’ll never know what direction the creator wanted to go with it. A victim of our troubled financial times more than anything. And as they say, great television taps into the zeitgeist of the country, so a show about a con man with a double-life just ain’t gonna play well in that dreaded zone that somehow determines the fate of too many pieces of entertainment — Middle America (with its bastard Central Time Zone… see a previous post about why the Central Time Zone hurts Network TV). Followed by ABC’s “My Generation” and NBC’s “Outlaw“; I’m not sure why the brass at ABC felt the semi-docudrama style of “The Office” and “Modern Family” would work for “My Generation.” The context of the project and the fact that it was a drama ran cross-purposes. Obviously the herd-mentality of “let’s expand the docu-drama style to an actual drama” was ruling the day. There’s been a lot projects with narration to start off the show, and I guess we’re going to see that technique beat a dead horse’s skin off and then we’ll see some continued flogging.

The story begin the failure of Lone Star to catch on is interesting, as a critically acclaimed show it’s a surprise that the audience didn’t like the cut of its jib… however shows about professional fleecers aren’t going to fly in the fuq’ed economy that we’ll be living in for the next couple of years. Still, when you look at HBO’s “Boardwalk Empire” you’re dealing with a fat cat who’s operating above the law and has the law in his pocket, and people have enjoyed that (I still need to watch my Third episode to see if I will give the show my time). Go scratch your head!

I miss some of my old shows that are had their run and no longer airing – Lost, Saving Grace, 24, Nip/Tuck, Damages(*), Battlestar Galactica, The Shield… and I look forward to the return of V (which UofM grad Scott Rosenbaum runs) and the prequel to Spartacus (too bad the continuing adventures just won’t happen).

(* Damages, while no longer on F/X, is supposed to return to DirecTv’s Channel 101 in January).

I’ve been watching F/X’s “The League” and NBC’s “Outsourced“, too, as we’ve developing a workplace comedy, which is a little more daunting than developing the several dramas that we’ve done over the last year or so.  Comedy is so damn difficult — making up jokes, specific comedy for the characters based on their wackiness, and sticking with a consistent comedic tone that is specific to a certain channel is part of the hurdles that we’re facing. And then creating and interesting show dynamics… yeah, lots of chainsaws to juggle to get it right.

The Leauge is hands down one of better comedies on the air — more accessible than many other shows, and since it’s an adult comedy on a cable network about some schlubs the language is borderline offensive ina hilarious sort of way; it has a low-rent and low-brow “Sex in the City”, and that’s why I think it has great appeal.

I just wonder how those guys pitched that to FX and got them to bite? One of the toughest things about presenting new creative narratives to the men and women behind the desk is knowing the most appealing way to present your material. Notice, how I didn’t say “best”, because there isn’t a “best” way to present your material; just a most effective way. You’ll never know how smart, creative or imaginative the people are on the other side of the table, and while most people in those positions can hang their hat on ONE of those categories, it’s usually not all three.

You shouldn’t confuse the fact that someone is smart, intelligent, clever, or what have you with someone who can provide great and elevating creative input – and that’s a hard point to recognize. Enabling people to contribute ideas isn’t necessarily about being smart, but being imaginative and seeing beyond what’s presented, being able to envision the final project. I remember when my brother and I were in the middle of post on our award-winning short filmF*ck You, Pay Me!” and our old manager wanted to see a cut of the film, and NONE of the CGI was complete (just green screen) and our manager couldn’t understand the film with the placeholder images in place. He was just asking these odd questions, like he couldn’t picture was going to be where — when the placeholder images had clear, bold text describing what the final shot was going to be/look like. It was right there and then that I said, “we have to find a new manager.” Was that harsh? Possibly, but it’s important to be able to SEE what can happen, what can be…

Okay that’s it for this week. Next week, I’ll bring back the Tinseltown Tips and my reaction to David Fincher‘s The Social Network (I wanted to watch all his previous films again, before commenting and I’m only at Panic Room right now).

  • Recent Updates

  • Sign up for our newsletter



     
  • What We’re Up To


    Entertainment Panel

    Once or twice a year, the University of Michigan Entertainment Coalition brings together a distinguished panel of Michigan alumni for an illuminating evening of questions and answers dealing with a specific area of the entertainment industry.

    Intimate Dinner Series

    Not to be confused with a candlelit meal with your significant other, the Intimate Dinner Series provides an opportunity for a select group of UMEC members to join a prominent alumnus for a round table dinner discussion in their area of expertise.

    UMEC Short Film Festival

    The festival’s goal is to showcase the broad production talents of Michigan alumni and students, and raise their profile within the entertainment industry. Any short film under 30 minutes in length that had a current or former Michigan student serve in a key creative capacity is eligible for consideration.

    Reel Wolverine Award

    The Reel Wolverine Award was established by the University of Michigan Entertainment Coalition to honor Michigan alumni who’ve made outstanding contributions to the entertainment industry and who uphold the highest standards of artistic and professional excellence in their work. The award is presented during the opening festivities of the UMEC Short Film Festival. Past recipients include Lawrence Kasdan and Peter Benedek among other notable alumni.

    Mentorship Program

    The Mentorship Program is a UMEC initiative to promote and strengthen a collaborative alumni network within the entertainment industry by connecting aspiring graduates with established entertainment professionals for one-on-one face time and guidance. The program is open to all University of Michigan alumni with career interests in the area of film, television, new-media, music, and sports entertainment.

    Internship Program

    The UMEC Internship Program aims to place qualified Michigan alumni as interns in their chosen area of the entertainment industry. Need an intern for your office or production? Let us know. We might just have the perfect person for you.

    Alumni Employment Opportunities

    If you have a job opening (or know of one), let us know and consider hiring a Wolverine. We’ll be happy to forward your needs on to our members.